Gender and rainwear

[JellyMan]

Following the theme I started…

I once saw a picture in a naughty magazine when I was little. I was a girl lying on a tree branch totally naked, except she was 100% flat chested. I was totally confused at what I was seeing - clearly no Willy (as I would have called it back then), plus she had short hair. Then at the other end you get ladyboys who are all woman except for a dick. To say you never would with a man depends on the definition of man, just as much as there will be women who are a totally turn-off to a gent who otherwise says he is into women.

So like the features of a person that put us into our ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ buckets rainwear wearing might tip the balance from ‘no’ to ‘yes’ if otherwise they are on the undecided line.

Heavy for a Sunday morning I know - sorry.

JM

[rainwear-experience]

So like the features of a person that put us into our ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ buckets rainwear wearing might tip the balance from ‘no’ to ‘yes’ if otherwise they are on the undecided line.
JM

Dear me, do you actually believe some of the tosh you write or are you just looking for engagement

Are you asking people to believe that if a member of the same sex wore the 'right' rainwear some people might be encouraged to have sex with them?

[JellyMan]

So like the features of a person that put us into our ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ buckets rainwear wearing might tip the balance from ‘no’ to ‘yes’ if otherwise they are on the undecided line.
JM

Dear me, do you actually believe some of the tosh you write or are you just looking for engagement

Are you asking people to believe that if a member of the same sex wore the 'right' rainwear some people might be encouraged to have sex with them?

Yes totally. And if you think otherwise then you don’t know much about people. Everyone has a tipping point between what is attractive and unattractive.

JM

[Taurus]

I am quite sure of myself that I will never be attracted to a man, not even in rainwear or other clothing made of vinyl or latex. On the other hand, there are also plenty of women who can wear whatever they want, even vinyl or latex, but who I will never find attractive either. But speaking of a tipping point, in some cases, clothing can persuade me to find someone attractive or not. If a woman dresses like an old lady, it won't help me to find her attractive but a nice raincoat or leather/vinyl jacket can sometimes make the difference.

[Nylon macs]

I am quite sure of myself that I will never be attracted to a man, not even in rainwear or other clothing made of vinyl or latex. On the other hand, there are also plenty of women who can wear whatever they want, even vinyl or latex, but who I will never find attractive either. But speaking of a tipping point, in some cases, clothing can persuade me to find someone attractive or not. If a woman dresses like an old lady, it won't help me to find her attractive but a nice raincoat or leather/vinyl jacket can sometimes make the difference.

This is what I was trying to say and meaning about myself

[dominamac]

When I was young I always thought I was hetero, but slowly started finding out some years ago that I liked not only men but in theory any gender in rainwear. This is because I believe that the attraction to rainwear is so strong that the space it takes up pushes the question of gender aside, and it becomes sort of irrelevant.

What are your personal opinions?

I'm a tranny who enjoys wearing ladies shiny trench macs as part of her lady persona. I've always been an admirer of ladies shiny macs and trench coats and, in my opinion, women who wear such garments look generally either stylish or sexy and sometimes both. Their choice of outerwear can certainly add to the attraction.

Until the last few years I always considered myself 100% heterosexual. However, since stepping out into the world in lady mode, I've discovered that I do like other convincing trannies and all the more so if they wear a mac. Perhaps this is nothing more than an extension of heterosexuality. I believe the term might be heteroflexible. There's no doubt however that rainwear can play a part in altering someone's preference if they have a passion or fetish for rainwear. This might not apply to everyone but is certainly true for me.

Other then that, I'm not the slightest bit interested in blokes. Never have been. Never will be. And that's regardless of whatever rainwear they happen to be wearing.

[rainwear-experience]

So like the features of a person that put us into our ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ buckets rainwear wearing might tip the balance from ‘no’ to ‘yes’ if otherwise they are on the undecided line.
JM

Dear me, do you actually believe some of the tosh you write or are you just looking for engagement

Are you asking people to believe that if a member of the same sex wore the 'right' rainwear some people might be encouraged to have sex with them?

Yes totally. And if you think otherwise then you don’t know much about people. Everyone has a tipping point between what is attractive and unattractive.

JM

Of course, everyone has a tipping point in what they see as attractive but I doubt many would go against their natural sexuality based on what a member of the same sex is wearing

Having led a team of 25-30 people in a work situation and worked with over 100 models of all ages and both genders, but mainly females, I think I have a reasonable knowledge of people and at least I dont need to ask a forum if I should employ someone just because they wear PVC trousers to an interview

[JellyMan]

It’s such a shame when you turn in your opinionated and frankly nasty side rainwear-experience. If you don’t agree or like what someone says you can say it in a way that is not confrontational. I sense an underlying disapproval from you to dredge up an unrelated posting from the past.

JM

[rainwear-experience]

Sorry for having an opinion that doesn't agree with some of the stuff you post but being closer to sixty than six I tend to say what I feel

I'll try to be a little more touchy-feely in future so I don't upset the more sensitive members

"And if you think otherwise then you don’t know much about people" so if someone doesn't agree with your theory they're accused of not knowing much about people and if they challenge you they are "opinionated and frankly nasty"

The only reason I brought up your previous post is it seemed to be a good example of your 'excellent' people skills although the post now seems to have disappeared

[JellyMan]

I was just reacting to your opening salvo of…

“Dear me, do you actually believe some of the tosh you write or are you just looking for engagement”

JM