RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

If you would like to share some pictures and videos please post them here.
Janine
Posts: 29
Joined: January 27th, 2010, 9:39 am

RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by Janine » January 24th, 2017, 9:12 am

There appears to be a dearth of real rainwear fetish films on the internet. There are many that depict lovely girls swishing around in their macs but none or very few of sex involving couples and rainwear. Are there any videos out there for instance depicting girls and men wearing rubber lined or latex macks involved in serious fetish sex? Isn't that what our fetish is all about and why we are here on this forum? Or have I got it wrong. Would love to know if you have a source.
Lots of rubbery mackintosh love,
Janine

TStorm56
Posts: 85
Joined: October 20th, 2015, 5:10 pm

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by TStorm56 » January 24th, 2017, 9:01 pm

As far as I know, there aren't any videos that depict full on sex in rainwear. The closest you will get is masturbation and nudity unfortunately. If you're looking for sexual activities you'll have to get a partner involved.

KlepperGuy
Posts: 20
Joined: January 14th, 2017, 11:32 pm

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by KlepperGuy » January 24th, 2017, 9:32 pm

Personally I find models 'swishing around in rainwear, posing is not for me.
So many photos also depict this..........give me real down to earth mackintosh/rainwear lovers anytime rather than a 'dolly bird' posing in a mack and probably getting paid for doing so.

Ray
Posts: 1752
Joined: January 17th, 2010, 12:35 pm

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by Ray » January 24th, 2017, 10:17 pm

Well you all seem to know what you want so maybe its time to get off your backsides, hire a camera, and get on with it!

Can't wait to see the results, please post a link when you've uploaded them :)

pvculike
Posts: 204
Joined: October 13th, 2014, 1:22 pm

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by pvculike » January 25th, 2017, 7:11 am

ray@rainwearcafe wrote:Well you all seem to know what you want so maybe its time to get off your backsides, hire a camera, and get on with it!

Can't wait to see the results, please post a link when you've uploaded them :)
Or post them on a dodgy porn site so that we can watch them for free! :shock:

nerzman
Posts: 174
Joined: January 19th, 2010, 2:29 pm

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by nerzman » January 25th, 2017, 8:44 am

Well you all seem to know what you want so maybe its time to get off your backsides, hire a camera, and get on with it!

Can't wait to see the results, please post a link when you've uploaded them
Well done Ray! - I couldn't have pointed that out any better :)

spitfire617
Posts: 1411
Joined: August 26th, 2013, 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by spitfire617 » January 25th, 2017, 9:35 am

ray@rainwearcafe wrote:Well you all seem to know what you want so maybe its time to get off your backsides, hire a camera, and get on with it!

Can't wait to see the results, please post a link when you've uploaded them :)
A bit harsh Ray!! lol lol
I am free Hire me!

spitfire617
Posts: 1411
Joined: August 26th, 2013, 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by spitfire617 » January 25th, 2017, 9:38 am

KlepperGuy wrote:Personally I find models 'swishing around in rainwear, posing is not for me.
So many photos also depict this..........give me real down to earth mackintosh/rainwear lovers anytime rather than a 'dolly bird' posing in a mack and probably getting paid for doing so.
LOL LOL
Real people rule.

bjhaus
Posts: 61
Joined: January 21st, 2010, 8:18 am

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by bjhaus » January 25th, 2017, 2:35 pm

I get the impression Janine thinks we're not quite hard-core enough to pass muster, and that revelation should somehow matter to us.

spitfire617
Posts: 1411
Joined: August 26th, 2013, 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: RAINWEAR FETISH VIDEOS

Post by spitfire617 » January 25th, 2017, 2:43 pm

bjhaus wrote:I get the impression Janine thinks we're not quite hard-core enough to pass muster, and that revelation should somehow matter to us.
Why should that be?

Post Reply