NOT SHINY BUT RATHER SEXY??

All rainwear discussions in general or that do not fit into other categories.
Post Reply
Shinytrench1
Posts: 23
Joined: December 9th, 2017, 1:27 pm

NOT SHINY BUT RATHER SEXY??

Post by Shinytrench1 » February 9th, 2018, 12:44 am

Saw this mac in a shop window the other day and - it's not PVC but very nice in my view - anyone agree?

https://www.hobbs.co.uk/product/display ... 18-outfits

WealdenMac
Posts: 220
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 8:24 am
Location: The Beautiful South

Re: NOT SHINY BUT RATHER SEXY??

Post by WealdenMac » February 9th, 2018, 10:55 am

I agree-a classic style with great buttons. Way back in my old MacSoc days Hobbs actually sold double-textured, or as they appear to be called now "bonded", mackintoshes. Upon enquiry they told me they sourced the fabric themselves but would not say where from.

spitfire617
Posts: 1517
Joined: August 26th, 2013, 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: NOT SHINY BUT RATHER SEXY??

Post by spitfire617 » February 9th, 2018, 10:57 am

Shinytrench1 wrote:
February 9th, 2018, 12:44 am
Saw this mac in a shop window the other day and - it's not PVC but very nice in my view - anyone agree?

https://www.hobbs.co.uk/product/display ... 18-outfits
Shame they will not fit my partner!

Debbie Maclover
Posts: 10
Joined: September 2nd, 2015, 2:38 pm
Location: North East England
Contact:

Re: NOT SHINY BUT RATHER SEXY??

Post by Debbie Maclover » February 10th, 2018, 8:51 am

I agree completely. This is a stunningly sexy number. Nice belt, perfect shape and the buttons add to the alluring nature of the mackintosh. No, it does not need to be shiny to be sexy.

Post Reply